reformat docstrings for sphinx

This commit is contained in:
2026-03-05 01:36:40 -08:00
parent 805262dfc4
commit faeef9c72a
3 changed files with 117 additions and 102 deletions

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
[project] [project]
name = "trainlib" name = "trainlib"
version = "0.1.0" version = "0.1.1"
description = "Minimal framework for ML modeling. Supports advanced dataset operations and streamlined training." description = "Minimal framework for ML modeling. Supports advanced dataset operations and streamlined training."
requires-python = ">=3.13" requires-python = ">=3.13"
authors = [ authors = [

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
""" """
Marginalizing out the modality layer: .. admonition:: Marginalizing out the modality layer
With ``domain`` being an instance variable, one possible interpretation of With ``domain`` being an instance variable, one possible interpretation of
the object structures here is that one could completely abstract away the object structures here is that one could completely abstract away
@@ -58,7 +58,10 @@ Marginalizing out the modality layer:
particular case of ``_process_batch_data()``, it feels much better when particular case of ``_process_batch_data()``, it feels much better when
it's on the inside.) it's on the inside.)
Holding: .. admonition:: Holding area
.. code-block:: python
@abstractmethod @abstractmethod
def _get_uri_groups(self) -> Iterable[tuple[U, ...]]: def _get_uri_groups(self) -> Iterable[tuple[U, ...]]:
Get URI groups for each batch. Get URI groups for each batch.
@@ -67,19 +70,19 @@ Holding:
metadata file), zip the URIs such that we have a tuple of URIs per metadata file), zip the URIs such that we have a tuple of URIs per
batch. batch.
Note that this effectively defines the index style over batches in the Note that this effectively defines the index style over batches in
attached domain. We get an ``int -> tuple[U, ...]`` map that turns the attached domain. We get an ``int -> tuple[U, ...]`` map that
batch indices into URIs that can be read under the domain. turns batch indices into URIs that can be read under the domain.
``get_batch()`` turns an integer index into its corresponding ``get_batch()`` turns an integer index into its corresponding
``tuple[U, ...]``, reading the resources with ``_read_resources()`` in ``tuple[U, ...]``, reading the resources with ``_read_resources()``
the tuple, treating them as providers of batched data. in the tuple, treating them as providers of batched data.
``_read_resources()`` passes through to the attached domain logic, ``_read_resources()`` passes through to the attached domain logic,
which, although common, need not supply an explicit iterable of batch which, although common, need not supply an explicit iterable of
items: we just access items with ``__getitem__()`` and may ask for batch items: we just access items with ``__getitem__()`` and may
``__len__``. So the returned URI group collection (this method) does ask for ``__len__``. So the returned URI group collection (this
need to be iterable to measure the number of batches, but the batch method) does need to be iterable to measure the number of batches,
objects that are ultimately produced by these URI groups need not be but the batch objects that are ultimately produced by these URI
iterables themselves. groups need not be iterables themselves.
raise NotImplementedError raise NotImplementedError
@@ -91,20 +94,24 @@ Holding:
Read batch files at the provided paths. Read batch files at the provided paths.
This method should operate on a single tuple from the list of batch This method should operate on a single tuple from the list of batch
tuples returned by the ``_get_uri_groups()`` method. That is, it reads tuples returned by the ``_get_uri_groups()`` method. That is, it
all of the resources for a single batch and returns a tuple of the same reads all of the resources for a single batch and returns a tuple
size with their contents. of the same size with their contents.
Note: the dependence on a batch index is mostly here to make Note: the dependence on a batch index is mostly here to make
multi-dataset composition easier later. In-dataset, you don't need to multi-dataset composition easier later. In-dataset, you don't need
know the batch index to to simply process URIs, but across datasets you to know the batch index to to simply process URIs, but across
need it to find out the origin of the batch (and process those URIs datasets you need it to find out the origin of the batch (and
accordingly). process those URIs accordingly).
return tuple(self.domain.read(uri) for uri in uri_group) return tuple(self.domain.read(uri) for uri in uri_group)
# pulling the type variable out of the inline generic b/c `ty` has trouble .. code-block:: python
# understanding bound type variables in subclasses (specifically with Self@)
# pulling the type variable out of the inline generic b/c `ty` has
# trouble understanding bound type variables in subclasses
# (specifically with Self@)
T = TypeVar("T", bound=NamedTuple) T = TypeVar("T", bound=NamedTuple)
class NamedTupleDataset[I](Dataset): class NamedTupleDataset[I](Dataset):
@@ -156,38 +163,41 @@ class BatchedDataset[U, R, I](Dataset):
which are used to concretize a domain ``Domain[U, R]``), and an item type which are used to concretize a domain ``Domain[U, R]``), and an item type
``T`` (which has a ``tuple`` upper bound). ``T`` (which has a ``tuple`` upper bound).
Pipeline overview:
``` .. admonition:: Pipeline overview
.. code-block:: python
Domain -> [U] (get _batch_uris) Domain -> [U] (get _batch_uris)
U -> R (domain access ; Rs provide batches) U -> R (domain access ; Rs provide batches)
R -> [I] (cache here ; _process_batch_data to use load_transform) R -> [I] (cache here ; _process_batch_data to use load_transform)
[I] -> I (human item obj ; _get_item) [I] -> I (human item obj ; _get_item)
I -> **P (final packed item ; __getitem__ to use transform) I -> **P (final packed item ; __getitem__ to use transform)
```
Note^1: as far as positioning, this class is meant to play nice with Note^1: as far as positioning, this class is meant to play nice with
PyTorch DataLoaders, hence the inheritance from ``torch.Dataset``. The PyTorch DataLoaders, hence the inheritance from ``torch.Dataset``. The
value add for this over the ``torch.Dataset`` base is almost entirely in value add for this over the ``torch.Dataset`` base is almost entirely
the logic it implements to map out of *batched resources* that are holding in the logic it implements to map out of *batched resources* that are
data, and flattening it out into typical dataset items. There are also some holding data, and flattening it out into typical dataset items. There
QoL items when it comes to splitting and balancing samples. are also some QoL items when it comes to splitting and balancing
samples.
Note^2: even though ``Domains`` implement iterators over their URIs, this Note^2: even though ``Domains`` implement iterators over their URIs,
doesn't imply a ``BatchedDataset`` is iterable. This just means we can walk this doesn't imply a ``BatchedDataset`` is iterable. This just means we
over the resources that provide data, but we don't necessarily presuppose can walk over the resources that provide data, but we don't necessarily
an ordered walk over samples within batches. Point being: presuppose an ordered walk over samples within batches. Point being:
``torch.Dataset``, not ``torch.IterableDataset``, is the appropriate ``torch.Dataset``, not ``torch.IterableDataset``, is the appropriate
superclass, even when we're working around iterable ``Domains``. superclass, even when we're working around iterable ``Domains``.
Note^3: transforms are expected to operate on ``I``-items and produce Note^3: transforms are expected to operate on ``I``-items and produce
``I``-items. They shouldn't be the "introducers" of ``I`` types from some ``I``-items. They shouldn't be the "introducers" of ``I`` types from
other intermediate representation, nor should they map from ``I`` to some other intermediate representation, nor should they map from ``I``
something else. Point being: the dataset definition should be able to map to something else. Point being: the dataset definition should be able
resources ``R`` to ``I`` without a transform: that much should be baked to map resources ``R`` to ``I`` without a transform: that much should
into the class definition. If you find you're expecting the transform to do be baked into the class definition. If you find you're expecting the
that for you, you should consider pulling in some common structure across transform to do that for you, you should consider pulling in some
the allowed transforms and make it a fixed part of the class. common structure across the allowed transforms and make it a fixed part
of the class.
""" """
def __init__( def __init__(

View File

@@ -268,19 +268,21 @@ class Trainer[I, K: EstimatorKwargs]:
""" """
Note: this method attempts to implement a general scheme for passing Note: this method attempts to implement a general scheme for passing
needed items to the estimator's loss function from the dataloader. The needed items to the estimator's loss function from the dataloader. The
abstract `Estimator` base only requires the model output be provided abstract ``Estimator`` base only requires the model output be provided
for any given loss calculation, but concrete estimators will often for any given loss calculation, but concrete estimators will often
require additional arguments (e.g., labels or length masks, as require additional arguments (e.g., labels or length masks, as is the
is the case with sequential models). In any case, this method defers case with sequential models). In any case, this method defers any
any further logic to the `loss` method of the underlying estimator, so further logic to the ``loss`` method of the underlying estimator, so
one should take care to synchronize the sample structure with `dataset` one should take care to synchronize the sample structure with `dataset`
to match that expected by `self.estimator.loss(...)`. to match that expected by ``self.estimator.loss(...)``.
On batch_estimator_map: .. admonition:: On batch_estimator_map
Dataloader collate functions are responsible for mapping a collection Dataloader collate functions are responsible for mapping a
of items into an item of collections, roughly speaking. If items are collection of items into an item of collections, roughly speaking.
tuples of tensors, If items are tuples of tensors,
.. code-block::
[ [
( [1, 1], [1, 1] ), ( [1, 1], [1, 1] ),
@@ -291,6 +293,8 @@ class Trainer[I, K: EstimatorKwargs]:
the collate function maps back into the item skeleton, producing a the collate function maps back into the item skeleton, producing a
single tuple of (stacked) tensors single tuple of (stacked) tensors
.. code-block::
( [[1, 1], ( [[1, 1],
[2, 2], [2, 2],
[3, 3]], [3, 3]],
@@ -299,9 +303,10 @@ class Trainer[I, K: EstimatorKwargs]:
[2, 2], [2, 2],
[3, 3]] ) [3, 3]] )
This function should map from batches (which should be *item shaped*, This function should map from batches (which should be *item
i.e., have an `I` skeleton, even if stacked items may be different on shaped*, i.e., have an ``I`` skeleton, even if stacked items may be
the inside) into estimator keyword arguments (type `K`). different on the inside) into estimator keyword arguments (type
``K``).
Parameters: Parameters:
lr: learning rate (default: 1e-3) lr: learning rate (default: 1e-3)